GLOBAL AND CURRENT AFFAIRS
THE TRUTH ABOUT BREXIT
Bulleted Outline Text and Fuller Discussion Text
[10/02/2025]
1. THE TRUTH ABOUT BREXIT - A BULLETED OUTLINE
5. A FOOTNOTE REGARDING 'POTENTIAL' [SECRET] RECORDING
N.B. Text STILL NOT yet properly completed or formatted, but may remain this way for some time now; other matters prevail.
In particular, I have been forced to leave a whole section out - due to mental interfering whenever attempting to complete it over the course of this whole weekend.
________________________
THE TRUTH ABOUT BREXIT - A BULLETED OUTLINE
For now, I shall have to continie to upload just this VERY SIMPLIFIED VERSION, owning to website scripting issues that, most frustratingly, have not yet been fully resolved.
The UK would CERTIFIABLY be far better off economically. |
There is ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT that the UK WOULD BE in a FAR BETTER ECONOMIC POSITION if they HAD NOT LEFT THE EU. |
| The UK was THE PERFECT EU CAPITAL. |
Furthermore, there is ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT that the UK was quite literally THE PERFECT NATION in THE PERFECT POSITION to hold the title of THE CAPITAL OF EUROPE; for a whole number of different reasons. |
Under today's prevailing uncertainties, it is likely that BOTH, the EU and the UK would be in a better, more ecomomically secure position RIGHT NOW, if the UK had not left. |
Thus, there is ABSOLUTELY NO DOUBT that both parties concerned would constitute a FAR MORE PROMINENT AND STABLE ECONOMIC POWERHOUSE entity with a far greater standing in the world, PARTICULARLY in the wake of these recent Trade Tariff discussions, threats and assertions by the current U.S. Administration. |
If its working PERFECTLY, WHY CHANGE ANYTHING? |
If you want to run a nation like a 'big city corporation', then you will almost certainly turn profit - ESPECIALLY IF YOU ALIGN YOURSELVES / YOUR ENTIRE NATION with the INSURGENT FORCES (though that is not the focus of this conversation). And if you have made money, ecomomic growth and profit your main barometers for success, and your main critereon for progress, and focis on that as your NUMBER ONE ASPIRATION, and if you set out to make the operational activities your whole nation support and align with those ASPIRATIONS (with those aims, ambitions and ideals), then, again, you will CERTAINLY MAKE INCREASING PROFITS. And the more of YOUR NATION / YOUR NATIONAL ASSETS YOU FLOAT AND SELL OFF TO EXTERNAL INVESTORS so as to bring in RECORD INVESTMENT, you will CERTIFIABLY BE IN FOR A GARGANTUAN WINDFALL, YEAR AFTER YEAR. But DON'T THEN TURN AROUND COMPLAIN when EVERYTHING IS RUNNING 'SMOOTHLY & PERFECTLY', PERFORMING 'EXACTLY AS IT IS SUPPOSED TO'; NOT WHEN IT IS BEING STEERED IN EXACTLY THE DIRECTION AND IN EXACTLY THE MANNER THAT IT WAS AGREED AND DESIGNED TO BE STEERED IN; AND NOT WHEN IT IS PERFORMING EXACTLY HOW IT WAS FORMUALTED TO PERFORM. BECAUSE IT WAS DESIGNED TO MAKE MONEY AND MAKE PROFIT, FIRST AND FOREMOST; AND THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY ARE DOING; And so, when the 'so-called TOUGH CALLS' come along, in truth, those calls aren't really that tough at all. |
| THE NOUGHTIES |
YOUNG PEOPLE, YOU'RE FIRED! |
| THE TEENIES |
[NEWER] YOUNG PEOPLE, WE'RE SO SORRY, BUT WE CAN NO LONGER MAKE AN ECOMOMIC CASE FOR YOU! You're going to have to pay your own way to compete with others we can acquire faster, cheaper and more qualified with more experience. Thus, you're going to have to LUMP IT or LEAVE! OR ELSE, YOU'RE FIRED! |
| THE EARLY TWENTIES |
OLD PEOPLE, HAVE YOU SEEN OUR SOCIAL CARE FIGURES & OUR PENSION FIGURES? WE HAVE TO MAKE SOME TOUGH BUSINESS CALLS! NOTHING PERSONAL! YOU'RE FIRED! |
But at the end of the day, ALL OF THAT IN ITSELF, NEED NOT NECESSARILY HAVE ANYTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH THE QUINTESSENTIAL QUESTION OF WHETHER BREXIT COULD BE DEEMED A SUCCESS OR A FAILURE.
________________________
2. INTRODUCTORY INTERIM TEXT
It is somewhat ironic and fitting that the current UK PM was addressing NATO alongside EU members for the first time since the UK leaving the EU because this happens to be a problem that they [NATO] are very familiar with; namely, having a totally unclear and undefined END GAME.
And this is the true issue that befell the UK populations during the course of that debate; a debate that ended up completely polarising the entire population; and essentially, tearing the nation in two for several years; in absolutely spectacular fashion;
And all because of the TOTAL FAILINGS of the key individuals ON BOTH SIDES;
BOTH SIDES COMPLETELY FAILED TO PROPERLY ARTICULATE THE MOST PERTINENT POINTS OF THE OVERALL DEBATE; NOT EVEN THE PERTINENT POINTS RELATING TO THEIR OWN SIDE, LET ALONE THOSE OF THE OTHER SIDE.
Instead, they just engaged in slagging matches against each other.
And then, thereafter, they NEEDLESSLY ENGAGED IN SELF SABOTAGE to ensure that the nation would never get a good deal either way.
****** 3. MISSING SECTION BELOW HERE ******
This truly should have been the easiest debate EVER.
But instead, they just allowed it to descend into one great big parliamentary slagging match in which both sides engaged in insults and casting aspersions against the other side, and they allowed that negative and highly toxic energy to consume the entirety of the energy supply of the public, at a time when they were supposed to be trying to make their minds up on a matter that could quite easily be deemed the most important decision of their lives; and to some, even, the most important decision in the entire history of their nation.
And this just made for a similarly heated, polarised and highly toxic sets of slagging matches / 'debates' that spilled over into the electorate in the public domain.
They even spent more time arguing about the number on the side of the bus than dealing with the key objectives that they should have been addressing; that should have been brought to light.
And even that aspect of the discussion could have been HUGELY FACILITATED - with a significant amount of unnecessary hostility being averted - with even the simplest of respectable and decorous acts as 'the other side' providing their own version of what they believed the estimated figure [on the bus] should have been [with regards to payments to the EU].
And the truth is that so much of that could EASILY have been avoided; in a whole variety of extremely simple, grown up and sensible, self-explanatory ways, following common sense respectable steps.
Their job was to ensure that the public was as fully and soundly informed as possible to make that key decision for themselves when the time for the vote arrived.
But instead, NO SUCH FIGURE was EVER FORTHCOMING; and they specifically made it their central policy NOT TO PROVIDE ANY SUCH FIGURE; NOR EVEN TO DISCUSS IT IN ANY WAY OTHER THAN TO ASSERT THAT THE FIGURE PROVIDED BY THE OTHER SIDE WAS WRONG.
This was an important matter that the general public were trying to navigate and then, arrive at an informed decision.
This was a decision that THEIR WHOLE FUTURES DEPENDED ON, and as such, it was INCUMBENT ON BOTH / ALL SIDES to provide the people with as much information as they possibly could; in order to assist them in making up THEIR OWN MINDS; to make an INFORMED DECISION.
And thus, the public DESERVED to have a contrasting figure provided to them BY THE OTHER SIDE [REMAIN] DISPUTING THE OTHER FIGURE.
Yes, there were CLEARLY ALWAYS going to be different interests and trade-offs, but at the end of the day, what was MOST IMPORTANT was that the people were provided with the best tools possible to make those trade-offs and decisions; provided with all of the KEY, pertinent and truest [as possible] information that they so desired [required/demanded/craved for].
Thus, surely, the people DID DESERVE TO KNOW what that figure actually was, irrespective of how unfavourable it might have been/seemed to one party or the other; because the people were trying to make an informed decision and as such, any party seeking to facilitate them in that process should have endeavoured to provide them with the information that they needed to know.
But instead, they totally refused to come up with a different number or explain fully where they believe the other side had gone wrong and hence, what that number SHOULD HAVE BEEN; and I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT A LOT OF PEOPLE WANTED TO KNOW WHAT THAT NUMBER WAS/SHOULD HAVE BEEN;. AND WOULD HAVE WANTED THAT OTHER SIDE TO PUT THEIR CONTRASTING FIGURE FORWARD, ALONG WITH ANY PROVISO /explanation as to why their numbers would have been so different to the other side's figure.
Indeed, I have lost count of the number of times I heard that matter brought up in some argument or heated discussion being engaged in, somewhere in the public domain, and similarly be being left SO TOTALLY FRUSTRATINGLY, UNHELPFULLY AND PROVOCATIVELY OPEN-ENDED AND UNRESOLVED, SUCH THAT THERE WAS NEVER EVER GOING TO BE ANY HOPE OF REACHING ANY DECENT LEVEL OF CONSENSUS ON THE MORE SENSITIVE AND NUANCED ASPECTS OF THE DEBATE IF THEY COULD NOT EVEN PLAINLY DISCUSS AND RESOLVE THE SUPPOSEDLY CLEAR-CUT, LESS/NON-SUBJECTIVE ASPECTS OF THE DEBATE.
Similarly, the decision to INTENTIONALLY polarise the debate in such a way that would then end up with respectable people feeling totally self-conscious about raising certain matters (in a most decent, respectable and constructive of ways and without any hostile, devious or sinister intent in mind ) simply because of the manner in which one side was framing the whole discussion, such that the other side were controversially and unhelpfully asserting that anyone who did wish to discuss matters along those lines at all was surely a right wing racist who needed to be called out as such; that is not to say that there were no such people; but to effectively aim to accuse half the electorate of being so inclined was certainly was never going to help matters or make for a constructive debate either.
But these different tactics and jibes were crucial to getting one up on the other side; you didn't need to discuss these matters with the other party; just somehow get to silence them. It was a case of talking at them instead of talking to them, and a victory was when the other side could not come back with any sort of response - FOR WHATEVER REASON; not because they had been met with a sound argument, but rather, just because they were made to feel a certain way [angry, frustrated, self-conscious, etc]; and hence, they would simply hold their silence and repress those feelings....
...until the next time they started a new 'discussion' from scratch [and if they were lucky, they would manage to repress them again, or alternatively, the whole thing would descend into yet another vitriolic slagging match].
****** MISSING SECTION ABOVE HERE ******
However, the truth of the matter is that the SIMPLEST AND MOST OBVIOUS ANSWER was actually STARING THEM IN THE FACE THE WHOLE TIME;
If only they had sought to present a PROPER CASE for the public to hear, rather than just scoring points against the other.
In essence, under those prevailing circumstances [just described], this matter COULD ONLY EVER HAVE BEEN RESOLVED APPROPRIATELY AND PRUDENTLY if it were overseen by someone who did not specifically have any close affiliation with either side; or else, at the very least, someone who was actually truly able to assume a position of complete and utter objectivity, such that all the noise from everyone else SIMPLY WOULD NOT HAVE MATTERED IN THE SLIGHTEST.
And of course, someone who was willing to consider a wider case than just the prominent sound bites that were being cast around and heavily accentuated by both sides in order to score points for their own TUNNEL-VISIONED STANDPOINT, rather than to ACTUALLY get to the bottom of what REALLY DID COUNT; FROM ALL ANGLES AND ALL PERSPECTIVES.
Because the truth of the matter is that THE WHOLE QUESTION OF BREXIT "WAS A TOTAL NO-BRAINER";
IT WAS A NO-BRAINER FROM THE VERY START, AND THAT DID NOT CHANGE AT ANY POINT DURING THE DEBATE; AND NOR EVEN, AFTER THE DEBATE;
AND NOR EVEN HAS IT CHANGED IN THE SLIGHTEST BIT EVEN RIGHT NOW, LONG AFTER THE DEBATE [SO TO SPEAK].
YET, BOTH PARTIES STILL COMPLETELY FAIL TO PROPERLY ARTICULATE THE MOST PERTINENT POINTS OF THE OVERALL DEBATE.
Even now, both sides continue try to score points against each other - and potentially re-open old wounds, but potentially, lining up to go through the whole process [EXACTLY THE SAME PROCESS] all over again, and STILL BEING NONE THE WISER ABOUT WHAT REALLY SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE MAIN TALKING POINTS IN WHAT SHOULD HAVE BEEN A WELL BALANCED AND OBJECTIVE DEBATE COVERING ALL MANNER OF DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVES.
And thus, the general public are NO CLOSER to resolving this matter among themselves [collectively] and bringing the whole matter to a point of closure in their individual minds, in their communities, and even, in their families; a nation VERY MUCH STILL DIVIDED; ON THIS SAME MATTER; WHEN THIS REALLY SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN THE CASE AT ALL.
I therefore conclude that THE ONLY REASON THE KEY POINTS DID NOT SURFACE [NOT FROM ANYONE -AND CERTAINLY, NOT FROM ANY PROMINENT INDIVIDUAL] IS BECAUSE SPECIFIC STEPS WERE MADE "UP HIGH" TO KEEP THOSE ARGUMENTS OUT OF PUBLIC DOMAIN AND HENCE, AWAY FROM GENERAL CONSUMPTION OF THE PUBLIC.
Of course, I could be COMPLETELY WRONG, in which case, this would truly prove that the general public have submitted their trust and faith to a group of politicians who ARE SIMPLY NOT FIT TO REPRESENT THEM IN ANY WAY; BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT THEY CAN TOTALLY MISS THE KEY POINTS OF AN IMPORTANT MATTER, EVEN AFTER YEARS OF DEBATE; THE KEY POINTS OF ARGUMENTS RELATING TO THAT IMPORTANT MATTER; AND ALL OF THIS, SIMPLY BECAUSE OF THEIR OWN INDIVIDUAL AND COLLECTIVE TUNNEL-VISIONED VIEW.
But either way, the simple fact that is borne out is that the people to whom the country has been entrusted their health and wellbeing - and their security, their faith and their hopes for the future - MORE OFTEN THAN NOT, SIMPLY DO NOT HAVE A CLUE WITH REGARDS TO KEY MATTERS, and thereby, they just WING IT, based on what they believe will keep them the most popular for the longest period of time; typically, in terms of election cycles.
Because in terms of the BREXIT DEBATE, I CAN CERTIFIABLY SAY THAT NONE OF THOSE PROMINENTLY INVOLVED IN THAT DEBATE 'HAD ANY CLUE' OF WHAT WAS TRULY OF IMPORTANCE AND HENCE, HOW BEST TO COMMUNICATE THAT TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC.
And I can tell you, EUROPE HAS NEVER HAD SO MUCH FUN, because under those circumstances, IT DID NOT MATTER WHAT DECISION THE UK ULTIMATELY MADE; THEY [the UK] WOULD LOSE EITHER WAY, AND THE EU WOULD WIN, EITHER WAY.
THE BIGGEST SLAM DUNK IN EUROPEAN HISTORY BY THE EU;
...AND LIKEWISE, THE BIGGEST GLARING MISS [A HUGE CALAMITY] IN HISTORY BY THE UK.
AND YET, I STRESS AGAIN THAT EVEN STILL TO THIS DAY, NO ONE SEEMS TO HAVE COTTONED ON TO WHAT THE TRUE AND FULL SCOPE OF CONSIDERATION FOR THAT DEBATE SHOULD HAVE BEEN;
The worst thing is that it wouldn't actually take very long AT ALL to explain the most pertinent points in the debate; indeed, as is OFTEN THE CASE, these things can often come down to just a single word [or even, a single letter];
That ULTIMATE THEME that causes THE ENTIRE SCOPE OF THE DEBATE TO BE RECALIBRATED; that TOTALLY RE-PHRASES EVERY ASPECT of BOTH ARGUMENTS; COMPLETELY SHIFTS THE OVERALL PERSPECTIVE IN ONE DIRECTION OR THE OTHER.
And THAT ABSOLUTELY WAS [AND COULD HAVE / SHOULD HAVE BEEN] THE CASE in this instance.
There is actually A SELECTION OF THEMES OF A SIMILAR STANDING, and I could easily have listed them out in quick succession, here in this text;
I could even have explained it all by encapsulating it all into just a single sentence or two.
But in terms of an/the ultimate theme, well, that could potentially have been reduced to JUST A SINGLE WORD; one that would have had a significant impact on the entire perspective of any individual concerned at the time;
But for dramatic effect, I have chosen not to disclose it at this point; to give people a chance to revisit the debate in their own heads, and decide whether they actually know what their true perspective is on the outcome of that debate; and whether it may have changed in any way since then;
....AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, now that VERY VERY SOON, THEY WILL DEFINITIVELY AND CERTIFIABLY be made aware of what the outcome SHOULD HAVE BEEN at the conclusion of that debate; [indeed, at the outset] and from the offset.
And in that respect, this WILL NOT BE OPENING OLD WOUNDS; RATHER, IT WILL BE MORE THE CASE OF FULL RESOLUTION; OF KNOWING WHAT TRULY SHOULD BE [OR SHOULD HAVE BEEN] DONE, and hence, WHAT TRULY SHOULD BE DONE IN ORDER TO ARRIVE AT A STATE OF TRUE CLOSURE ON THAT ENTIRE MATTER; ONCE AND FOR ALL.
Of course, no-one should ignore the reality check of this paragraph; namely, the fact that as things stand, I cannot even say whether we, as a species [as a whole] will actually have more than a month or two remaining on this planet IN ANY CASE
And there are various different reasons why that might be the case, as well as various different possible means by which this could potentially be brought to bear.
But essentially, there is ONLY ONE MAIN REASON that stands out above all others that would then increase the likelihood of any sort of abrupt and/or unceremonious eradication from this planet and thereby, make the case for such an outcome SO CLEAR CUT;
Namely, THE FAILINGS OF AN ENTIRE SPECIES and the manner in which they can SO EASILY ALLOW/ED THEMSELVES to be TOTALLY CORRUPTED by the devious antics and machinations of the powerful entities and/or overlords of a powerful collective; POWERFUL, YES; BUT NOT OMNIPOTENT, NOT ALL-POWERFUL, AND NOT EVEN, TOTALLY DOMINANT [as is proven, courtesy of my prolonged existence in the face of many attempts being routinely made against me to bring about my untimely demise].
...or at least, that is how these matters would seem [from my personal perspective] to have ultimately been played out; i.e. the failings of every other human individual ever called upon and/or placed in a position where they could have made a difference at the sharp end of existence, here on this Earth.
But nevertheless, this could then just simply be added to that list of matters that COULD HAVE AND SHOULD HAVE BEEN, if the various parties concerned had chosen differently at the respective points that THEY DID FIND THEMSELVES AT THE SHARP END OF THE EXISTENCE OF HUMANKIND ON THE FACE OF THIS PLANET and when they, as individuals, had a chance to do so.
Another important reality check - one more pertinent to the topic in hand - concerns the key questions that people should be asking themselves at this time.
Namely, people should, hereafter, ALWAYS bear in mind that IF THEIR ELECTED LEADERS COULD BE SO GLARINGLY WRONG ON THIS SINGLE MATTER, and IF NONE OF THEM WAS ABLE TO SEE THE TRUE MERITS AND THE TRUE SHORTFALLS OF THE ARGUMENTS [NOT EVEN IN TERMS OF THEIR OWN ARGUMENT],....
.....THEN HOW MANY TIMES DOES THIS ACTUALLY OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE COURSE OF A GIVEN PARLIAMENT, OR A GIVEN GOVERNMENT? AND HOW MANY OTHER TIMES HAVE THEY DONE THE SAME THING? POTENTIALLY ABOUT FAR MORE IMPORTANT, CRITICAL AND MORE FAR-REACHING MATTERS?
...AND HENCE, CAN THEY ACTUALLY TRUST THE WISDOM, THE LEADERSHIP, THE JUDGEMENT AND THE DIRECTION OF THEIR LEADERS AS THE FINAL DECISION-MAKERS AND POLICY MAKERS ACTING ON BEHALF OF THEIR POPULATIONS AND THEIR CITIZENS THAT THEY GOVERN OVER AT ALL??
I shall leave you ALL to answer that question for yourselves; I CERTAINLY DO NOT WANT TO PUT WORDS INTO YOUR MOUTHS.
However, the truth of the matter is that I ALREADY KNOW WHAT I HAVE TO SAY, AND HENCE, WHAT I SHALL THOSE APPLICABLE PARTIES WILL BE RECEIVING IN THE NEXT FEW DAYS, and as such, ....
....I KNOW THAT I WON'T HAVE TO / NEED TO.
Thus, I shall be providing the KEY ASPECTS OF THAT DEBATE IN DUE COURSE, at some point hereafter, once the more pressing matters have been addressed [of which there are many].
But still, it might be worth some parties revisiting the matter [at least briefly] and re-tracing your thought processes and decision making at the time; but this time, you may do so in a totally calm and relaxed manner, knowing that this is NOT for the purposes of putting any vote through; rather, just part of the process of FINDING OUT THE TRUTH FOR YOURSELVES; ABSOLUTELY AND DEFINITIVELY.
STARTING with your re-familiarising yourselves with WHY YOU MADE THE DECISIONS YOU MADE AT THE TIME; AGAIN, NOT STRESS OR ANGER OR FRUSTRATION NECESSARY; JUST AS AN EXERCISE TO RECALL WHAT YOU WERE THINKING AT THAT TIME; AND MAYBE EVEN, CONTRAST THAT TO WHAT YOU ARE THINKING NOW;
And you might even try and see if there are any other matters that you might have overlooked previously, with regards to this debate; Again, ALL JUST AS PART OF AN EXERCISE IN OBJECTIVITY; AS WELL AS TO GAUGE AND TEST THE SOUNDNESS AND SUITABILITY OF THE JUDGEMENT OF YOUR LEADERSHIPS.
Then, we will be able to see whether this time around, in a non-pressurised environment, YOU YOURSELVES are actually able 'to see the wood from the trees' [so to speak] or WHETHER YOU SIMPLY NEVER EVER DID STAND A CHANCE IN RESPECT OF THIS MATTER; NOT GIVEN ALL OF THE PREVAILING NOISES OF THE LOUD VOICES OF THAT TIME;
Which would mean that you were [pretty much ALL] effectively FULLY DEPENDENT UPON THE APPARENT 'WISDOM' and 'SOUND JUDGEMENT' OF THOSE IN WHOM YOU HAD PREVIOUSLY VOTED IN AND/OR PUT YOUR TRUST IN, AT THE HEAD OF THIS PARTICULAR NATION / POPULATION / COLLECTIVE, HERE ON THIS EARTH.
All because they totally failed you, as I have said many times before, and as I will so plainly show and explain to you.
And then, you will understand just HOW MUCH TOTALLY UNNECESSARY MAYHEM, TURMOIL AND ANIMOSITY YOU WERE ALL CAUSED [FORCED] TO HAVE TO ENDURE at that time; with 'seasoned politicians' and 'similarly seasoned' [so-called] political expert alike completely failing in their basic duty and responsibility to the people; to protect their interests and keep them suitably informed so as to enable them to keep fully on top of the matters of pertinence and, where necessary, to make the best and most appropriate choices and decisions; as opposed to just being directed to and STRATEGICALLY INFORMED about those matters that would certifiably improve the [re-/election] chances of some particular party or other during the very next election cycle.
[But that is A WHOLE NEW DISCUSSION for a TOTALLY DIFFERENT DAY].
4. SUMMARY
Thus, to summarise,
TRULY, IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN THE EASIEST DEBATE IN THE HISTORY OF THIS NATION; THE ARGUMENT WAS AS CLEAR AS DAY;
HOWEVER, BOTH SIDES COMPLETELY FAILED TO PROPERLY ARTICULATE THE MOST PERTINENT POINTS OF CONCERN IN THE OVERALL DEBATE; NOT EVEN THE PERTINENT POINTS RELATING TO THEIR OWN SIDE, LET ALONE THOSE OF THE OTHER SIDE.
And that AND ONLY THAT is the true reason why the BREXIT debate, the self-sabotaging and the subsequent agreements reached have lead the nation to where they currently are.
Still with no one having ANY IDEA OF WHAT THE KEY ASPECTS OF THE WHOLE DEBATE ACTUALLY WERE.
However, as a TOTAL NEUTRAL in this debate, I shall outline EXACTLY what the true issues were, and hence, what the true argument and concerns of the British People SHOULD HAVE BEEN during that debate.
And that discussion will prominently feature ONE PARTICULAR WORD that starts with a particular letter, namely.....
...a letter featured a few times in the song:
'THIS IS HOW WE DO IT' - by MJ;
________________________
5. A FOOTNOTE REGARDING THE NOTION OF A [SECRET] RECORDING
I previously mentioned that I suspected someone had made a recording of me and may have circulated it at some point.
However, upon reflection, there is every likelihood that they just took the information and had a completely different party deliver those same points for themselves.
Thus, one might be well choose to ignore any such notion of a recording of me actually BEING ALLOWED TO BE CIRCULATED;
Indeed, I should mention that EVERY TIME I HAVE BEEN ON ANY TV PROGRAM (at least, any occasion that I have known about and have consented to), VERY METICULOUS STEPS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT I AM NEVER EVER IN VIEW;
And that includes STRATEGICALLY HIDING ME BEHIND A CHRISTMAS TREE so that a quarter of my being would appear from behind that Christmas tree whilst swaying from side to side, as we were required to.
And moreover, this also took place A WHOLE DECADE OR SO EARLIER THAN THAT PARTICULAR OCCASION, where, having gone to the studies and fully recorded an episode of a then-regular children's program (as 8 year old children), our teacher was REGRETTABLY INFORMED that that particular episode WOULD NOT be able to be aired.
And these are NOT the only occasions EITHER.
Thus, as I have said MANY TIMES BEFORE, it is SHEER FOLLY to simply attempt to dismiss the repeated occurrences of BLATANT COINCIDENCES as ALL BEING nothing more than MERE COINCIDENCE,.
Thus, again, EVEN THOUGH I PERSONALLY DID NOT CONSENT TO[OR EVEN, specifically KNOW about or suspect at the time] this particular recording (if one were indeed, secretly made), I simply do not believe that this will have been allowed to be aired / propagated IN ANY WAY THAT WOULD EVER BE ABLE TO POTENTIALLY PRESENT OR PORTRAY ME IN ANY GOOD LIGHT / REMOTELY FAVOURABLE MANNER.
Or alternatively, if my voice were used, then it would only have been allowed if the recording were DEVIOUSLY ALTERED IN SOME HIGHLY DETRIMENTAL FASHION, so as to maliciously portray me in some highly questionable and incompetent manner.
One in which they could interminably poor some incessant level of scorn upon;
.....AND THEN [AND ONLY THEN], WOULD IT HAVE BEEN AIRED/PRESENTED AND BE FULLY ATTRIBUTED TO ME.
________________________
6. THE BIG 'G'
G...
________________________