INTERIM DOCUMET
3.0 ADDITIONAL CORRELATIONS AND CONSIDERATIONS
6.0 BY WHOM AND FOR WHAT PURPOSE?
7.0 PERSONALISED MOMENT-SPECIFIC SYMBOLIC COMMUNICATIONS
8.0 THE "OTHER" SYMBOLIC CORRELATION/S
PREFACE
This document was sent to the initial academics to whom I first disclosed the details regarding the true orbit of the Earth around the Sun, as well as the information pertaining to the fall of Jupiter.
This disclosuer took place back in the summer of 2024, and happened to coincide with the 'Crowdstrike' IT outage, which is featured prominently in this text.
It should thus be borne in mind that much of the additional content that readers of this site will have read prior to now had not been made available to the recipients of this information back then.
It should also be noted that at some stage, I do intend to return back to this document and reformat it slightly, in addition to adding in certain key portions of text that are, at present, still absent from the document.
Evidently, there will be various other factors that will dictate when/whether I actually do get round to performing these updates that I currently do intend to do at some stage in the future.
Thus, time will ultimately tell.
SYMBOLIC CORRELATIONS RELATING TO MY ORIGINAL INFORMATION RELEASE
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Whereas this interim document was initially meant to cover some of the currently included content in a little more detail, I have decided to abbreviate some of the subject matter considerably and then, to instead include that information in a companion document that explains the related themes with a slightly more general approach.
There is actually alternative documentation that I have written which covers these themes in even more detail, however, given that this version of the information had, for the most part, already been written for the interim document and moreover, given that it was only a brief interim explanation that I was seeking to present at this time, I have added the separate companion interim document alongside this current initial interim document (specifically, the original portion and the more detailed portions of that originally intended interim document).
I should also mention that shortly before the first part of this newer version of text was effectively completed, a very different notion seemed to have become apparent (and/or was conveyed to me in particular manner) which has caused me to ask certain questions about a particular item of source material that I mention prominently here in this text.
That has caused me to have to supplement this text with certain specific additional information"(which has taken significantly longer than I would have liked). But that said, a whole new level of pertinent symbolism was subsequently revealed to me after that introduction, which thus provokes yet another set of additional questions to be asked in their own right.
Thus, even though I cannot be 100% certain of the veracity of this 'different notion' that seems to have become apparent, it seems to have been quite clear that I was required to delay releasing this initial text until that secondary portion was also completed and submitted at the same time. [Indeed, this may also be the reason why a previous text I make reference to has also been delayed].
Thus, you will find the initial part of the interim text (along with that additional information) in this first part of the text to be sent to you.
The more general part of the document will be provided shortly afterwards (possibly with the newly revealed content contained somewhere therein or else, this additional information will be provided at some point further down the line - yet to be decided).
2.0 THE CROWDSTRIKE OUTAGE
Many of you will almost certainly have noticed that my release occurred on the same day as the CrowdStrike IT outage.
However, even though I personally did not actually hear anything about the IT outage until late in the afternoon - after having spoken to the various parties at the universities, it was IMMEDIATELY apparent that the two events were indeed inextricably linked.
How? I hear you ask?
There are actually a whole series of symbolic correlations relating to recent events surrounding my information release and the symbolism contained within the name and logo of this company.
The most pertinent set of correlations pertain to the Paulo Coelho book, "The Alchemist" and indeed, I would go as far as to described the correlations with this book as being recursive in nature.
Moreover, I actually happened to mention about three weeks prior to the recent information release (mentioned in an as-yet-uncompleted document that I had partwritten, including this reference specifically on account of some of the reasons hat I am about to list below [though clearly, this will not include the CrowdStrike-specific correlations.
Briefly, the most pertinent [additional] symbolic correlations are as follows:
The book speaks about the observation of symbolic communications; often referred to in the book as 'The Language of the World', this relates to the likes of seers and diviners and the whole notion of reading and interpreting signs; that happens to be the main purpose of me disclosing this information here.
There is a key part of the book in which the boy [the main protagonist] observes two hawks flying in the air, after which one of them enters into a dive to attack the other.
And immediately thereafter, he gains a vision of men entering into their oasis camp to rob them. The boy reports these events and the means by which they have been communicated to him [which is results in him actually meeting the alchemist for the first time]. And those events actually do materialise just like in his vision, allowing those in the camp to be fully prepared in advance so as to avert any consequent misfortune.
In contrast, you will notice that the symbol of the company CrowdStrike seems to depict a diving bird.
Furthermore, you will also notice that this correlates to my warnings in the document, in which a 'Falling' or 'Diving' Jupiter can be correlated to the notion of a diving bird.
One last correlation of some pertinence refers to the fact that a certain BBC program (which I used to watch every week up to about three or four years or so ago) actually made specific mention of the word "Alchemy" [albeit in a rather forced and unnatural manner in my opinion, which needn't necessarily have been the case]. But in any case, people who have followed my information for a number of years will already be familiar with the fact that this particular program was [and may be still is] renowned for featuring themes and/or notions that are symbolically related to proximately compiled documents and topics released and/or discussed by me.
3.0 ADDITIONAL CORRELATIONS AND CONSIDERATIONS
There is also a selection of additional correlations that do not specifically pertain to the book.
(i) On the one hand, there is the name of the company, namely, 'Crowd Strike' which has some symbolic relevance given that I sent that document to a sizeable group of recipients on that day [relatively speaking - a dozen or so, considering the fact that I have only ever disclosed it to a solicitor up to that point, and pertinent parts thereof to one or two other individuals in particular]; the 'Strike' portion of the phrase then relating to the individuals being 'targeted', so to speak.
(ii) In addition, there is another phrase that correlates to a similar notion, namely, using the word 'Crow' instead of Crowd; the crow, being a black bird, contains a lot of symbolic significance in itself, with other similarly relevant symbolic references to them including the movie "The Minority Report" and, in a manner of speaking, the 'Clipped-winged' Ravens of the Tower of London [among many others].
(iii) Moreover, the remaining letter 'D' also have similarly pertinent symbolic significance, numerologically speaking;
(iv) On top of this, there was also yet another correlation of a much more PERSONALISED and MOMENT-SPECIFIC nature; indeed, in a manner not too dissimilar to the diving bird incident discribed in the aforementioned book, and what you will later learn is that this actually happens to be a rather regular occurrence that I will often make some level of reference to.
And, in a not-too-dissimilar sentiment to that which is conveyed in the book, I will often say that there are only so many coincidences that one can observed and acknowledged to be occurring in sequence and/or in rapid succession before one simply has to accept that there clearly has to be more to all of those [routinelyoccurring] coincidences than just mere coincidence.
I cover this particular matter in greater detail in the penultimate section of this text as well as in the fuller document, suffice it to say for now that there are a great many symbolic correlations that I routinely observe and experience, with some of them being extremely elaborate and intricate in nature, and many of which I will even go as far as to describe (in various other documents and messages) as being truly amazing and awe-inspiring to be able to witness first hand.
However, many of these symbolic communications are actually relevant more on a ersonal level than on a general level - i.e. relating more to my personal experiences, memories and associations than any relevance to the average person on the street.
As such, that means that many of the observations and sentiments will not actually hold up very well when attempts are made to convey them to a wider audience - not unless careful and meticulous effort is invested to ensure that the relevant information is presented in just the right manner (in particular, with sufficient background information being provided and with everything being presented in the right order with appropriate emphasis) such that enough of those original observations and sentiments would still effectively be witnessed and 'felt' or 'sensed' by the intended recipients; [and this is not even always consistently the case across all of the actual recipients of a particular given communication or subject matter].
Thus, careful consideration is ALWAYS REQUIRED and one must constantly make judgement calls, weighing up all of the pros and cons in respect of how much and a how widely any intended positive outcome could potentially be received versus how much of a detrimental effect could result all round as a direct consequence of that same communication.
4.0 ISSUES RELATING TO TIMING
There is one other key consideration concerning the actual timing of the CrowdStrike outage [and perhaps more pertinently, the reporting thereof] - given that we shall for the moment defer any questions and considerations concerning the possible 'whos' and 'whys' of these communications until towards the end of this document.
As such, we can briefly consider the fact that the outage was reported to have started to occur the night before, and then spread westward across the globe during the morning periods of the more westward-located nations affected.
That said, however, I personally did not decide whether or not I was going to send that message to multiple recipients until around mid afternoon, and moreover, I had not even decided to contact the Universities at all until mid morning, having just disclosed a key new portion of the relevant information to the police first thing in the morning (as part of an ongoing, historical burglary case).
With all of that in mind, this leaves me wondering just how genuine the reported timing of the outage may or may not have been.
(i)That is to say that on the one hand, it may have occurred prior to the my decision making, hence possibly involving some level of foresight; another theme that you will become increasingly familiar with as being a capability that is VERY REAL and COMMONPLACE in certain [esoteric] circles.
(ii) Whilst on the other hand, it is quite possible that they actually reverse-engineered the story once I made the first phone call, so as to make it seem as though it had started in quieter from during quieter hours on the other side of the globe where few witnesses would actually need to be required to corroborate the reported story.
(iii) And moreover, given the fact that I had written and intended to circulate some of this information for a good few weeks prior, they could have had EVERYTHING set in place for that moment (a fact that proves pertinent for certain other possible scenarios also). Thus, in this instance, it might have been the overall delay factor that was used to deceptively make it seem more as though there was an element of foresight involved.
There is also another key phenomenon worth making mention of in that there have been a variety of different occasions in the past where I PERSONALLY could not vouch for the actual existence of a particular company or establishment prior to it being featured in some way that involved very particular symbolic correlations.
And as such, just as in those historical occasions, I cannot even rule out the possibility that the name of the company here could potentially also have been fictitious prior to the intended symbolic introduction in relation to this topic;
Of course, other people may definitively be able to vouch for the existence of these companies prior to their usage in these instances, though in this particular scenario, again, owing to the fact that I had already mentioned the book, the bird and all of that similarly related symbolism a good few weeks prior, these people would really need to be able to vouch for the companies existence a month or so prior to that usage in order to be able to categorically assert that it was indeed true foresight capability that was responsible for the symbolic correlations in this instance.
Then on top, there is also the possibility that my decision-making might actually have been influenced by certain external parties/entities in order to cause me to make the set of decisions that I did that would lead to all subsequent events and decisions unfolding the way that they ultimately did.
When all is said and done, the truth of the matter is that there is absolutely no way that I would EVER be able to definitively certify whether (or even, when in general) my decision making is being manipulated by external factor and when it is 'my own decision making' that is behind the decision that I make.
In fact, more generally, there is actually no way that ANY OF US could even ascertain what percentage of the decisions that we make are actually anything to do with our personal choices at all; after all, even if it were 100% of our decisions that were being influenced by the various external factors, we, at this lowly level of existence, would have ABSOLUTLEY NO WAY of proving it one way or the other.
Thus, from another perspective, the only thing you can absolutely be certain of is that there absolutely will be certain times and certain circumstances where decisions that we believe we have made were indeed, for all intents and purposes, actually made for us by external forces, whether through those external forces influencing us in some indirect manner or alternatively, actively manipulating our mental faculties in a direct and totally indiscernible manner.
And the same logic described in these recent paragraphs applies here even more so, given that symbolic correlations were involved in proceedings.
As such, even though I personally will assert that it was certifiably my own decisionmaking on this occasion that led to my decision to make the various calls that I made on that day that ultimately led to me then later sending the email that I did, the truth of the matter is that I must be [and indeed, am] always aware of the fact that there might inherently be a much greater level of internal/mental manipulation involved in my/our own decision-making than meets the eye; again, especially where very specific sequences of events of symbolic significance proceed thereafter.
Now, as far as the timing is concerned, one might actually be tempted to ask what difference it makes when the events actually did genuinely occur and why this might have anything to do with the timing of my decision-making.
Well the answer to such a question would relate to the fact that it would then be possible for certain parties to FALSELY purport to having a level of capability that they DO NOT ACTUALLY HAVE AT ALL, and as such, they might try to then use this to their advantage in some way.
In particular, if a particular party can guarantee themselves a significant level of access to a person of particular spiritual significance [most chiefly, the Christ individual himself ....or Herself], then it would be possible for that party to routinely meddle with the environment (and items therein) of that particular key individual such that they would then be in a position to ARTIFICIALLY MAKE IT APPEAR AS THOUGH they had mastery of capabilities that they simply did not possess at all, essentially pertaining to foresight capabilities.
In essence, these parties would attempt to convey the notion that certain phenomena and activities (which could somehow be attributed to these parties) and which were occurring or being observed within the target individuals environment or sphere of influence certifiably did imply that those particular parties actually did possess foresight capabilities.
6.0 BY WHOM AND FOR WHAT PURPOSE?
In the pervious section, I alluded to 'particular parties' wishing to convey this or that to other parties or individuals.
But as to the question of who those parties might be and for what purpose they might be wishing to communicate this information, I shall now briefly speculate the answer to those questions here in this section, whilst slightly more in-depth discussions are provided in the companion document (that was originally set to comprise the latter portions of this same interim text).
In the main, this communication will typically involve some higher level and/or more powerful party or entity trying to convey information to a target individual or recipient (or a group thereof) at a lower level, and in this particular case, there is a very good chance that I personally was the target individual in question [though this could still ultimately end up proving not to have been the case at all].
And in terms of the originator of these 'communications' well this could pertain to a wide range of possible candidates; possibly human individuals or human collectives (i.e. possibly, secret societies and the like), or possibly even, collectives of some other form or being [such as the beings that genetically-modified the human species].
And then, at yet higher levels, we have the potential of this corresponding to higher level celestial entities; i.e. the Earth, the Sun or Galaxy (which are actually ALL living sentient intelligent entities in their own right, with celestial entities extending all the way up the celestial hierarchy to just beneath the Almighty Creator who resides ABOVE ALL CELESTIAL HIERARCHIES - which could possibly be infinite in number).
All of these celestial entities have a living spirit, just as we do, and additionally, they will also all host additional higher and lower level component spirit entities within them, just as we do also.
As such, the symbolic communications that I observed (and indeed, that I routinely observe) could actually originate from any of the aforementioned potential candidates, as well as any combination thereof also, meaning that any of these candidates can append their own additional symbolic communications [and additional layers thereof] to the intended symbolic communications of ANY other type of candidate originator.
This notion is discussed in a little more detail in the companion document, where we discuss why such types of communications might actually be engaged in in the first place.
Next, we have the other topic that is to be briefly considered here relating to the question of why efforts might be made to make circumstances appear in a different manner [such as timeframe] to what really was/is the true case, and there are various reasons for this also, though typically, this will involve the lower level candidates such as groups and secret societies collectives and any designated offshoots thereof.
Thus, at one end of the spectrum, they might actively try to lead a particular target individual [i.e. me personally] to believe that the origins of some particular 'seemingly observed phenomenon' in their [my] immediate environment actually came about in a way that would seem to certifiably imply that an element of foresight capability was involved; perhaps to try and [mis-] lead me into believing that the activity was brought about by entities from higher, celestial levels of existence; perhaps in the hope that if they were successful in that regard, then there would potentially be a greater chance of me possibly believing / considering the communication to have originated from Greater Powers; i.e. that it was instigated by higher level entities of the divinely-aligned Celestial Hierarchy.
As such, if those groups can secure/guarantee themselves a significant level of access to the immediate surroundings of a person of particular spiritual significance [most chiefly, the Christ individual himself ....or Herself], then it would be possible for those groups to routinely meddle with the environment (and items therein) of that particular key individual, such that that key individual might classify observe and subsequently classify phenomena and alterations instilled by that group (in a retrospective manner) in the same light as those that pertain to higher level Celestial Entities.
And thus, thereby, these groups might anticipate that this would potentially given them a greater chance of success in misleading me in some major fashion [though as I include a little later in the text, I will virtually never make up my mind purely on what the origin of the information appears to be at any given moment in time; never without also applying additional rationalisation and so-coined 'due diligence'].
And then, at the other end of the spectrum, there is also the possibility that such parties engage in these sorts of misrepresentative activities in order to try to guarantee themselves a falsely elevated standing, ranking and/or level of significance among other similar parties and peer groups access [who they might be competing against each other in some manner - and cooperating in other respects].
Thus, perhaps they seek to falsely 'command a greater level of respect' or some higher ranking [which may quite possibly secure them a whole variety of other perks as distinct from various other similar parties and groups]; all under the false pretence that they possessed this foresight capability, again, achieved by means of their own greater level of access to the immediate environment of that target individual.
In this respect, I can certifiably say that even just in this last few days or so, there have clearly been items in my immediate environment though which I had already made certain observations and had started to write up information in respect of those observations, only to later return to those items and discover that additional symbolism (actual [falsely added] alterations on a particular book cover) had subsequently been inserted onto the item/s in question.
As such, it is my suspicion that certain parties were specifically seeking to retrospectively insert their symbolism into some falsified time sequence so that they could imply that this could only have been done by means of foresight (or at least, implying a much higher level of intervention than plain corporeal realms of existence.
Essentially, because they had retrospectively created a particular reported sequence of events and had falsely made alterations to that pertinent source material in my home - owing to their access to my environment - they hoped that their symbolism would end up being referenced by this particular key individual [yours truly, the Christ individual] as having been existed and been present previously [i.e. more than a decade ago, when the book was first printed and then, acquired by me] because they already knew that certain other aspects (that I was already going to write up on) were present at that time and had been observed by me in relation to that timing.
Thus, it was hoped that I would then stipulate that their additions also had been present all those yeas ago, even though they had been added just days prior to my reporting on that matter.
It is actually also worth me mentioning the fact that similar instances of this sort of meddling are readily performed by powerful collectives on a much grander scale, such that they can retrospectively insert completely falsified events into the annals of history without anyone else even considering the possibility that it was all falsified at a much later (potentially, contemporary) date.
For example, by falsifying the discovery of certain artefacts and then, by inventing a whole host series of other related events and documentation into certain 'new' history books that would subsequently be presented as old staples of key institutions, for which key experts and professors of that topic and that documentations would also be materialised into being, as well as whole classes of false students who supposedly studied under these retrospectively-created well respected individuals and can all remember very vividly using that particular book to study that particular topic;
All to the extent that, for all intents and purposes, that false event 'actually did take place' and those retrospectively-created books did indeed exist a long time in the past, given that there is just as much corroborating evidence available to support these false notions as there is to support any other historical event that we are led to believe took place at some point in history.
7.0 PERSONALISED MOMENT-SPECIFIC SYMBOLIC COMMUNICATIONS
Now, you may remember me previously mentioning that I would defer discussion of a
certain type of symbolic communication until the penultimate section of this text;
namely, this section here, and the title thereof.
Thus, to set the scene, you will remember me mentioning the fact that I had actually been intending to send this information for several weeks if not months. However, as is typically the case, owing to constant meddling and devious antics, that whole process had been derailed a great many times, from mental meddling or physiological interventions to impair my ability to attend to the writing itself to physical / environmental interventions such as actual deletions and thefts of my hard copy and digital data respectively.
Mental meddling relates to internal meddling with my mental faculties to prevent me from 'feeling able' and/or 'being able' to complete the task in hand, be that meddling with my concentration, with my mental processes and brain activity (i.e. seeming to actively alter the speed at which my brain is physically able to function, which I will often describe as being akin to the occurrence of neurons persistently and repeatedly misfiring) or even, creating hormonal aversions that make it difficult to actually settle down and attend to the writing at the time that one actually sets out to do.
When I say physiological meddling, I typically refer to meddling within my body so as to tighten the various sinews and internal organs within my body, forcing me to have to immediately set aside that time in order to stretch and disentangle my body.
However, for the purposes of this text, I shall also include the notion of 'gassing me' with some form of knock-out drug so as to send me to sleep for hours on end at precisely the time that I was intending to attend to some particular critical undertaking, and further, causing me to wake up much later that I would ever have intended, most often in a relatively disorientated state, with all of the mental formulations of my intended documentation that existed previously having since been completely expunged from my mind.
And then, there are the physical / environmental types of interventions previously alluded to, which will typically involve some level of encroachment into my home.
As it happens, the night before that phone call, it is likely that ALL TYPES of meddling had occurred; that is to say that I awoke with a groggy sensation that thus seemed to imply that I had been knocked out and sent to sleep in an unnatural way, and certain documentation was missing when I finally did awake.
And there is a good chance that mental meddling was engaged in that night before (as had been the case for many prior nights, weeks and indeed, months also) to impair and delay my ability to complete the documents that I was seeking to attend to.
As such, these were all additional factors that ultimately led to me making the decisions that I did on the morning in question.
However, I can distinctly remember me questioning myself and whether I had actually done the right thing in releasing this documentation on that particular day in the manner that I had.
And it was during that line of questioning that it was mentally conveyed to me that there was actually some benefit to me making contact during that particular week, given that many university staff had already departed for the holidays, and by the next week, it was likely that that number would only have increased; and potentially, significantly so.
An while this was being communicated to me, another certain song was brought to my mind which also has symbolic significance to the CrowdStrike symbolic themes previously discussed.
The song title was 'Fly Like an Eagle' by the music artist 'Seal' who, in addition to him being one of the very first music artist through whose material symbolic information started to be communicated to me, also happens to be a regular source of such communications every now and again.
And in this particular instance, it was essentially just one particular phrase of that song that was brought to my mind, namely the phrase "Time keeps on slipping [into the future]", in this particular instance and context, seeming to allude to the fact that this delivery date was constantly being put back [to some later date in the future].
Thus, in conjunction with the considerations just previously discussed above, this particular phrase being brought to my mind at that particular moment seemed to have been intended to help convey the notion that there actually was indeed some level of advantage, value and benefit in communicating that information to the intended recipients on that particular day, thus serving to provide a reasonable argument that the pertinent decision-making may not ALL have been ENTIRELY of my own doing.
Now, this personalise level of communication cannot always be described to other people given that they will not appreciate all of the links and associations that help the intended recipient arrive at the particular conclusions that they do.
But then again, the message was NEVER actually intended for any other recipients and hence, exactly what needed to be conveyed to the intended recipient [yours truly] was indeed conveyed to that intended recipient at that moment and by those particular means.
And it is thus, my current belief that this particular aspect of the communications may have originated from a higher level entity [from Greater Powers], utilising another symbolic source that was likely created by some human collective or other to serve some particular purpose that may or may not have been intended for my personal observation and consumption.
8.0 THE "OTHER" SYMBOLIC CORRELATION/S
As intimated in the Introduction section of this text, there was actually a different notion (a very particular notion) that was communicated to me between Friday and Saturday of the first weekend in this new month (2-3rd August 2024).
That notion seemed to imply that certain aspects of the book [The Alchemist] that I have referenced throughout this document and also, over the course of this past month in other documents) this might actually have been reverse-engineered and altered so as to deviously incorporate certain key aspects and descriptions from my texts into that book and thereby.
That is to say that I am now given cause to believe that this might have retrospectively been altered, specially as part of that universal drive to remove from all of existence, absolutely any and every positive contribution that all possibly be attributed to me, by allocating it to other parties instead.
More specifically, there was a certain word and sense that was initially communicated to me (as a recollection from the book) that caused me to trawl through certain parts of the book in search of that particular descriptive notion, however, even though I was unsuccessful in locating that specific description in any of the possible places where I believe it could have been located, what I did observe and ascertain was the fact that a great many of these descriptions simply seemed to resonate "too much" with my specific descriptions that I have used over the course of the last decade; descriptions that I simply would not [and have not been] associating with this book (that I already hold in high regard for helping to formulate and fortify certain themes and beliefs at a key part of my spiritual journey - in a particular manner].
And it is specifically because I view this book in that regard that it seemed so apparent that the book was now resonating with me for "all the wrong reasons" considering all the sentiments that I had previously attached to this book.
These were not at all the sentiments that I had been mentally attributing to that book all of these years; this was something different; this was something extra; this seemed too familiar in respect of certain descriptions that I often utilise, but key descriptions that I simply would NEVER have associated with this book (from the time that I had read it).
It was then a few hours later that it was brought to my mind that the book was likely retrospectively altered - along with likely thousands of other reference books, course books, papers and thesis, and all manner of other records, documentation and source material (possibly dating back centuries in certain instances), and all with the objective of disseminating absolutely every aspect of my information and intellectual property so as to have it attributed to a whole variety of different sources spread over a wide period of time so as to effectively reduce the whole complement of my positive contribution to existence and to humankind [as the Christ individual] to 'ABSOLUTLEY ZERO'.
It is likely that all of this was carried out with the full intention that I would be soon be completely eliminated (murdered) if all went according to plan, but with the comfort that even if they still were not able to successfully eliminate me, then they could at least be sure that not a single positive contribution across the whole of the human population would ever be attributed to me personally.
Now, before I proceed with this inference, I should at least fully qualify the context of my assertions with the following:-
I do firstly have to admit that I did only ever read that book once through, and that was two whole decades ago.
Additionally, I must concede that with the exception of the odd couple of times where I might have had to reference a particular word or phrase from that book over the course of the last couple of decades or so, I simply have not ever had cause to pick up and reread that book ever since.
And moreover, I must also concede that in certain respects, I will almost certainly have been in a very different place and position with very different perspective and outlook on certain themes and notions.
Thus, there is the slimmest of possibilities that I might have actually read those bits that seem to be resonating "too much" with my work now (in respect of what I previously attributed to this book) but would not have had anything solid and tangible to compare them with in relation to the contents of my psyche at that time so as to not necessarily pay too much attention to those passages and descriptions back then, the first time around, only to foster a very different reaction this time around. [I personally believe this to be unlikely].
Similarly, I will also add that there is even the possibility that I myself might have assimilated that information into my own thoughts and beliefs (whether or not I was aware of it at the time) such that upon reviewing the information, it is seeming to resonate with me more than I realised the first time around such that my own writings and experiences seem to be reflecting and resonating what was described. [Again, I personally believe this to be HIGHLY unlikely].
I will just reemphasis at this juncture that I believe that these last couple of points are highly unlikely, particularly given that I was already well on the way into my spiritual journey to discover truth directly from Greater Powers, already believing that it would be through any medium (anything around me and any one around me) that I might possibly receive information and communications from Greater Powers.
And lastly, I must concede that there is absolutely no possible way for me personally to be able to ascertain what the true state of affairs actually is on this matter. [and that will FOREVER remain the case for as long as I live].
But all of that said, what I do have to acknowledge is the manner in which this notion was communicated to me and brought to my attention; in such a resonating layered fashion.
That is to say that I first referenced the book on account of its spiritual content and its correlations relating to the diving birds.
Then, there was a certain word that came to mind that initially made me want to search in the book for the manner in which that particular word was introduced [which I felt to defer].
Next, I proceeded to provide the explanation of why certain groups might wish to falsely imply that their pertinent symbolism had originated (and hence, had been inserted) at a much much earlier time than was really the case.
Thereafter, I was led to add the portion of text concerning the similar but grander scale deceptions relating to retrospectively altering actual recognised histories in a even more thorough, comprehensive and deceptive fashion.
And then, the morning afterwards, I was finally caused to search through to look for that specific word and associated information that I had avoided and deferred when first brought to mind.
And it is on account of that search that I was caused to [re-] read certain passages and descriptions of that book (I reiterate, a book which I already held in high regard in respect of being a crucial cog in the wheel in terms of my spiritual journey and so, with no real reason to wish to question its trustworthiness on a personal level) but yet, certain aspects of some of those descriptions simply seemed to resonate "too much" with certain aspects of my writing and with the descriptions of certain particular themes; more than I believed should be possible, given my recollections of that book and what I attributed to it.
The key factor here is that this was a book that I already held in high regard (which may have been why the specifically selected it) and it was a book that was steeped in mysticism and the supernatural, with a whole raft of concepts pertaining to the reading and interpreting of signs, coincidence, spirituality and the super conscious.
And yet, there just seemed to be very specific aspects of my documents (recent and longstanding documentation) instilled into that certain portions of the book, giving rise the question of whether this book had actually been reverse-engineered as part of a grander scheme to disseminate absolutely all of my information and intellectual property to other sources all over the world.
---------------------------------------
------- more text is missing from below this point -------
---------------------------------------